Landmark Indian Court Ruling on Citizenship for Tibetans

On December 22, 2010 the Delhi High Court passed a judgement (W.P.(C) 12179/2009 ) supporting the right of a Tibetan born in India to claim Indian citizenship by birth, as per the Indian Citizenship Act (CA). This may have implications on the status of other Tibetans who fall under the same category.

The Tibetan, Namgyal Dolkar, who was born in India in 1986, had contested the denial of an Indian passport to her by the Regional Passport Office in Delhi, which had said that she could not be considered an Indian citizen. She had argued her case based on the Indian Citizenship Act (CA).

The High Court said that Namgyal Dolkar “is an Indian citizen by birth in terms of Section 3(1)(a) CA.” It ruled that “She cannot therefore be denied a passport on the ground that she is not an Indian citizen in terms of Section 6(2)(a) PA.”

Section 3(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act says that every person “born in India, – (a) on or after the 26th day of January 1950, but before the 1st day of July, 1987” “Shall be a citizen of India by birth.”

The Court ruled that the RPOs argument against granting of a passport to Namgyal Dolkar was “erroneous” and asked it to start the process of granting her a passport.

The Court also said an Indian Ministry of Home Affairs’s “policy decision not to grant Indian citizenship by naturalization under Section 6(1) CA to Tibetans who entered India after March 1959 is not relevant in the instant case.” The Court seems to be making a distinction between Tibetans who have entered India and those who were born in India.

The court also said, “The holding of an identity certificate, or the Petitioner declaring, in her application for such certificate, that she is a Tibetan national, cannot in the circumstances constitute valid grounds to refuse her a passport.” To date, all Tibetans who are considered stateless are provided with a travel document called the Identity Certificate by the Indian Government.

This court ruling may impact many Tibetans who are born in India between 1950 and 1987, including on matters like property ownership or government service. The Court made it clear that such Tibetans do not even have to formally apply for Indian citizenship saying “no such application process is envisaged in Section 3(1)CA.”

We will wait to see how this plays out in the coming months. You can read the full text of the Delhi High Court ruling here.

About these ads

6 responses to “Landmark Indian Court Ruling on Citizenship for Tibetans”

  1. Tammy/Tseten Dolma says :

    Thank you for discussing this article here. I had read the news via Phayul. No one at their site was able (willing?) to comment further via the topic.
    I live in McleodGanj and write on Tibet in exile for a western audience with the goal of broadening awareness of the Tibetan situation in the “west”.

  2. choneyi gyaltsen says :

    i hope tibetan people who leave and bron in india , who strrugle for thare identity,, can use this new law and have a graet and meaning ful future , all thanks to namgyal dolker

  3. Tenzing Tsering says :

    Meaningful life future means what? Tell me what will u gain by having Indian Passport and what are you losing if you have Tibetan Passport?

    • Bhuchung Tsering says :

      At the fundamental level having an Indian passport provides legal security, whether in terms of property or means of livelihood. Unfortunately, there is no alternative of a Tibetan passport, but only refugee documents. One can work for Tibet as strong as anybody even if one carries the passport of any other country.

      • tenzin says :

        well without knowing the thing properly we shouldn’t say.. Indian govt knows that Tibetans doesn’t have pass port but they intentially don’t provide for our betterment and coz of central Tibetan administration .. first we should know thing properly . and yeah so many people are there who don’t really appreciate the case of namgyal dolker..if u want to know exactly ask some CTA officer at dhasa . try to know why exactly we are not granted for pass port…then say ..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 28 other followers

%d bloggers like this: